Eight times the catalogue coverage on the same content budget

The challenge

The retailer sells a catalogue running to thousands of SKUs, predominantly business to business, on a fixed marketing budget that reached under 2% of that catalogue a year. That maths forces hard choices: every year the business decided which products would be heroed for the coming twelve months, and ran a small number of very targeted shoots against those picks. Everything else sold on whatever imagery it already had.

Then AI-enabled commerce changed the tempo around them. B2B resellers now recategorise and reclassify products on a whim across the year, and the retailer didn't have the content to back the flexibility of the ask. Every reseller move became a choice between bodging something together from old assets or missing the sales campaign entirely - across the major warehouse-level retailers and the smaller bespoke ones alike.

The approach

The brief arrived as a traditional shoot. We proposed an alternative route instead: a hybrid model tying production capture and generation to live demand, integrated across the full cycle - creative, production, and paid deployment. Real photography anchors the visual truth of the products; generation extends it across the range; and demand signals decide where the capacity points, so content lands where resellers are actually asking.

That route is what unlocked the numbers: 16% of the catalogue refreshed in year one, scoped to 38% annually, on the same budget - and the coverage runs across print, digital, and the imagery categories themselves: product shots, lifestyle, campaign work, multiple-angle shoots, even narrative storytelling. None of that was possible under the old model. And the particular that mattered most: the retailer's own art director and set stylist keep control of the style and the lifestyle creative process they already ran - the model extends their direction rather than replacing it.

The same catalogue, the same budget: one shoot a year covered a sliver; capture and generation tied to live demand covered eight times as much.

This engagement reframed how we talk about AI in commerce content. The industry debate obsesses over whether generated creative performs - and meanwhile the bigger number goes unexamined: what share of your range has content at all. For a B2B catalogue business the question is sharper still, because the merchandising decisions aren’t even yours. Resellers running AI-enabled commerce recategorise products faster than any shoot calendar can follow, and a retailer that can’t supply the content simply drops out of campaigns it never chose to enter.

The hybrid model works because neither half pretends to be the other. Photography does what only photography can - the ground truth of real products, real materials, real light. Generation carries that truth across thousands of SKUs, every format and imagery category, at the tempo the resellers set. And the adoption insight that made it stick: the people who own the look stayed in charge of it. The art director and set stylist who ran the brand’s creative process before still run it - with a range that finally keeps up.

The client stays unnamed and the figures are directional rather than audited. The shape is what transfers: when content capacity is tied to live demand, a fixed budget stops being a constraint on coverage and becomes a choice about ambition.

Deliverables

Hybrid capture-and-generation content model

Demand-tied content planning framework

Full-cycle integration across creative, production, and paid

Art-direction controls preserved within the generation workflow

Related thinking All entries

LEGO

Gamified L&D with AI character generation

Eight times the catalogue coverage on the same content budget

Do we need a new tech stack or not?

Do we need Fable 5?

Don't build your business on something someone else can switch off

LEGO